This is only a SUGGESTION and it is not in any way official. It is just an idea that I had, and I want to see if anyone would support it. I would like to propose a new way to handle towns. What if there was 2 "Ranks" for towns? Lets call them villages and cities for now. Villages: Would require 3 active people to start and would have a maximum size of 128 x 160 (20,480 blocks or the equivalent of 5 people using all 4 of their 32x32 residences). Must have a theme and a clear defined border Must maintain 3 active people or protections can be removed. Free of Cost Cities: Would require 6 active people to start and would have a minimum starting size of 160 x 192 (30,720 blocks or the equivalent of 7.5 people using all of their 32x32 residences). Must have a theme and a clear defined border Must maintain an Active Primary Leader or protections can be removed. One time cost of $18.00 USD One person must be picked as the Primary Leader and you can only be the Primary Leader of one City. (You may contact Staff to relinquish your leadership to someone else if you wanted to start a new city.) Overall rules: Village and City Leaders do not count toward a village's or city's active player count that isn't their own. Must maintain a reasonable distance from another Village or City, unless permission was granted by the neighboring Village or City. With the recent addition of Buycraft, we could have some Village / City upgrades available like town portals, NPCs, etc. Why am I suggesting a price for Cities? My thought behind it is people are more likely to stay with something that they put money into. I know I am more likely to keep playing here on Crafthub because I have contributed money here and I have been perks like Sethome, Residence, etc. Cities are relatively cheap at $3.00 a head or 1 person paying $18.00 out of their pocket. Since Cities are paying for their perks, their minimum activity level is lessened (only needing their Primary Leader to be active vs. 3 active people). Constructive criticism is always welcome.